Cases 11 - 20 of 1,764
Hall v. Welch, Jr.
as 9:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hall
Defendant:
Thomas H. Welch, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Methodist Hospital et al
as 4:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
James H Jones
Defendant:
Methodist Hospital, District Attorney's Office, Roy Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsey v. R P D C Medical Dept et al
as 3:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Jamie H Lindsey
Defendant:
Medical Dept Richland Parish Detention Center, Kendra Vaughn and R P D C Medical Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Steen et al
as 5:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jason Perkins
Defendant:
Daniel Steen, FNU Peyan, Erin Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Lumpkin
as 24-10184
Petitioner:
Scottie H. Gibson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, r, State of Texas 413th Judicial District of Johnson County, State of Texas 249th Judicial District Court of Johnson County and others
Sanders v. Ward et al
as 7:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Heather W. Pederson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Gregory S. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Solomon v. Sheriff, Jefferson County
as 1:2024cv00109
Petitioner:
Surafel H. Solomon
Respondent:
Sheriff, Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Bowers et al
as 4:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Berry Raydell Freeman
Defendant:
Rodger E. Bowers, Dustin T Wanders, Christopher N. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gentry v. Maxey
as 24-20021
Plaintiff:
James H. Gentry
Defendant:
E. Maxey, Officer, A. Oliver, Officer and Bryan Collier
Spensley v. USA
as 3:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
Douglas H Spensley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
