Cases 11 - 20 of 184
Munoz v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00478
Petitioner:
Martin Munoz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Harrison v. Partain et al
as 4:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
Marcus Harrison
Defendant:
H. Partain, Cpl P. Hollie, Sgt D. Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Britt et al
as 4:2023cv01172
Plaintiff:
Vernon King, Jr
Defendant:
M P Britt, Blake Lamb, D. Blackshire and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hardesty v. Ta et al
as 9:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lenard Hardesty
Defendant:
Diane Ta, Mark Roberts, Donald Munoz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Kizzie et al
as 4:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Mark Andrew Garcia
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Schlonda Kizzie, Captain Curtis Jordan, Asst. Warden Daniel Munoz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Summers v. Collier et al
as 1:2022cv00605
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leon Summers
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Oscar Mendoza, Stephen Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gutierrez-Munoz v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv00428
Petitioner:
Mariano Benjamin Gutierrez-Munoz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Munoz v. Tarrant County
as 4:2022cv01006
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Munoz
Defendant:
Tarrant County
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Munoz v. Red Oak Police Department
as 3:2022cv02411
Plaintiff:
Martin Munoz
Defendant:
Red Oak Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davila v. Cox
as 22-40627
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Miguel Davila, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden J. W. Cox, Officer Brown and Officer Munoz
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
