Cases 11 - 20 of 293
Lumsden v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Lumsden
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, FNU Hazelwood, A. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Nurse Mr. Hutt et al
as 4:2023cv02477
Plaintiff:
Preston Lee Dean
Defendant:
Nurse Mr. Hutt and Nurse Mrs. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Collier
as 23-20225
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darryl Bell
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, Executive Director, John Doe, TDCJ Director, Jerry Sanchez, Regional Director and others
Mungaray v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
Jorge Mungaray
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Patrick L. O'Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballard v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv00461
Petitioner:
Garrett James Ballard
Respondent:
Bruce Armstrong and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ballard v. Armstrong
as 6:2023cv00288
Petitioner:
Garrett James Ballard
Respondent:
Bruce Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armstrong v. HCSD et al
as 1:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Max Deshund Armstrong
Defendant:
HCSD, Unknown Bowman and Unknown Lege
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumsden v. Collier
as 23-50129
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raymond E. Lumsden
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, C. F. Hazelwood and others
Simmons v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Deldrick Simmons
Defendant:
Bruce Armstrong, Spencer Lucas, Daniel Parler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denby v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Donis Lemond Denby
Defendant:
Bruce Armstrong, Spencer Lucas, Daniel Parler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
