Cases 11 - 20 of 278
Shepard v. Ben Henderson et al
as 4:2023cv03188
Plaintiff:
Steve D. Shepard
Defendant:
Ben Henderson, Officer K. Davis and Montgomery County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepherd, Jr. v. Deputy Sgt Wulf et al
as 4:2023cv03086
Plaintiff:
Steve D. Shepherd, Jr.
Defendant:
Deputy Sgt Wulf, Montgomery County Sheriff's Office and Deputy Sheriff Ben Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Gaines
as 23-10488
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Ben P. Gaines
Demery v. Mitchell et al
as 5:2023cv00573
Plaintiff:
Victor Demery and Victor Jerome Demery
Defendant:
Luke Mitchell, Julie Jones and Ben Langford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Absher v. Ballard et al
as 3:2023cv00164
Petitioner:
Thomas Absher
Respondent:
Ben Ballard and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Guillen v. Basse et al
as 4:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Christopher Guillen
Defendant:
David R. Basse, Gerald Buluti, Lannette Linthincum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trantham v. Ballard et al
as 3:2023cv00075
Petitioner:
Randall Steven Trantham
Respondent:
Ben Ballard and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guillen v. Basse et al
as 9:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Christopher Guillen
Defendant:
David R. Basse, Gerald Buluti, Lannette Linthincum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaines v. USA
as 3:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Ben P Gaines
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McGowan v. Ballard
as 3:2023cv00023
Petitioner:
Scott Ross McGowan
Respondent:
Ben Ballard and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
