Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Murphy v. Bush
as 3:2008cv00789
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Defendant:
George W Bush
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Judd v. Bush, et al
as 08-41048
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE W BUSH, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and MARQUES MARTIN
Valdez v. Bush et al
as 3:2008cv01481
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hugo Valdez
Defendant:
George W Bush, District Attorney's Office, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Judd v. Bush, et al
as 08-40806
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE W BUSH, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and MARQUES MARTIN
Judd v. Bush et al
as 1:2008cv00352
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
George W Bush and Marques Martin
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Davis v. Bush, et al
as 07-51224
Petitioner - Appellant:
TONY ROBERT DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE W BUSH, In His Official Capacity as the President of the United States, MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL, In His Official Capacity as the Attorney General of the United States, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Murphy v. Bush
as 5:2007cv01515
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Defendant:
George W Bush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Bush et al
as 1:2007cv00688
Petitioner:
Tony Robert Davis
Respondent:
George W. Bush, Alberto R. Gonzalez, The Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Haley v. Bush et al
as 5:2007cv00975
Plaintiff:
John Benjamin Haley
Defendant:
George W Bush, Dick Cheney and Condolezza Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larson v. Staples et al
as 6:2007cv00205
Plaintiff:
Justin Larson
Defendant:
Janice Staples, Cloey Chancey, George W Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
