Cases 11 - 20 of 2,632
Tyner v. Arnold et al
as 3:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Scott Tyner
Defendant:
Dr. Unknown Arnold, Warden Unknown Brown, Unit Manager Loretta Crockett and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Coleman
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Felix Fernando Gonzalez
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. John Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00989
Plaintiff:
Robert Price, Jr
Defendant:
John Doe and Lucas Courrier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Tommie James Reed, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mixon v. Cross et al
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Danny Mixon
Defendant:
Ms. Cross, Mr. Osobrook and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kopatz v. John Doe, UTMB-Telford Unit et al
as 5:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Brian Kopatz
Defendant:
John Doe, UTMB-Telford Unit, John Doe, UCC-Telford Unit, Brandy Curl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Hancock
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, FNU Mr. King, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Freddie Monroe Pickett
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendricks v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Monty Allen Hendricks
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
