Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Smith v. Chambers County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2019cv00045
Plaintiff:
Curtis James Smith
Defendant:
Chambers County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Ladner et al
as 3:2019cv00028
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Estus James Smith
Defendant:
Warden Brian Ladner and Sgt. Tirah Mixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Engle v. Hunt County Texas Commissoner, et al
as 18-10309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK EUGENE ENGLE
Defendant - Appellee:
HUNT COUNTY TEXAS COMMISSONER, GREENVILLE MAYOR, GREENVILLE CHIEF OF POLICE and others
John Smith v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-20668
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN JAMES SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Albert Smith v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-50706
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALBERT JAMES SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Engle v. Hunt County Texas Commissioner et al
as 3:2017cv02213
Plaintiff:
Mark Eugene Engle
Defendant:
Hunt County Texas Commissioner, Greenville Mayor, Greenville Chief of Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estus Smith v. MDOC/MDOC Employer
as 16-60678
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESTUS JAMES SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
MDOC/MDOC EMPLOYERS
Smith v. Davis
as 4:2016cv02546
Petitioner:
John James Smith
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. MDOC/MDOC Employers et al
as 1:2016cv00209
Plaintiff:
Estus James Smith
Defendant:
MDOC/MDOC Employers, Unknown Banks, Marshall Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estus Smith v. Brian Ladner, Warden
as 16-60028
Petitioner - Appellant:
ESTUS JAMES SMITH, also known as James Estus Smith
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIAN LADNER, Warden, Central Mississippi Correctional Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
