Cases 11 - 20 of 1,254
Garrison v. John Does and Janes Does, Coffield Unit
as 7:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Curtis Allen Garrison
Defendant:
John Does and Janes Does, Coffield Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. John Does and Jane Does Byrd Unit
as 7:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Curtis Allen Garrison
Defendant:
John Does and Jane Does Byrd Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. John Does and Jane Does French Robertson Unit
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Curtis Allen Garrison
Defendant:
John Does and Jane Does French Robertson Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mejia v. Oster
as 24-40380
Plaintiff:
Rene Mejia
Defendant:
Amanda Oster, Sabrina Austell, Jacyn Johnson and others
Barrera v. Rush et al
as 7:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Armando Barrera, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge James Rush, Dusty Gallivan, Melissa Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Freddie Monroe Pickett
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Reed
as 24-30329
Plaintiff:
Troy Davis
Defendant:
P. Reed, Captain, Joseph Westbrook, Master Sergeant, Unknown Scott, Sergeant and others
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Freddie Monroe Pickett
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Freddie Monroe Pickett
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Magill et al
as 4:2024cv01946
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Brandon-Keith Henry
Defendant:
A.D.A Matthew Magill, A.D.A. Jane Doe #1, A.D.A John Doe / Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
