Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Granderson v. Hanak et al
as 4:2018cv02332
Defendant:
Chief of Homicide Rex Phelps, Julie Renken and Sheriff Otto Hanak
Plaintiff:
Samuel Mortay Granderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gallon Hodges v. Lorie Davis, Director, et al
as 17-20643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GALLON WAYNE HODGES
Defendant - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, WARDEN OHARA, WARDEN PRESTWOOD and others
Reginald v. Owens et al
as 1:2017cv00399
Plaintiff:
Edwards Reginald
Defendant:
Clara Owens, FNU Phelps, Jordan Landrio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodges v. Davis et al
as 4:2017cv02614
Petitioner:
Gallon Wayne Hodges
Defendant:
Lori Davis
Respondent:
Warden Ohara, Warden Prestwood, Keith Thredford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Samuels et al
as 1:2016cv00197
Plaintiff:
James Samuel Murray
Defendant:
Charles E Samuels, Jr, John A Keller, Frank Lara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Fox et al
as 3:2015cv00100
Plaintiff:
Brian George William Cook
Defendant:
Justin Fox, R. Phelps, Brian Pecor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lakeisha Adams v. James Rogers, Warden
as 14-31004
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAKEISHA SHANAE ADAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES ROGERS, WARDEN, C. PAUL PHELPS CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Burrell v. State of Texas
as 4:2014cv02333
Petitioner:
Frederick Burrell
Respondent:
State of Texas and Shane Peter Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Darius Patterson v. Steve Rader, Warden
as 14-30747
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARIUS PATTERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE RADER, WARDEN, C. PAUL PHELPS CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Kimberlin Edwards v. James Rogers, Warden
as 14-30733
Petitioner - Appellant:
KIMBERLIN EDWARDS
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES ROGERS, WARDEN, C PAUL PHELPS CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
