Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Hargrove-Thomas v. Young et al
as 5:2019cv00225
Defendant:
Alfreda D. Carreon, William P. Clements Unit, Brittany S. Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Jamel Hargrove-Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillard v. Davis et al
as 7:2019cv00081
Defendant:
Dakota R Denney, Elbert G Holmes, Joe Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel D Dillard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Buggs et al
as 3:2019cv00829
Defendant:
Lloyd N Womack, Tracy Bedford, Victoria M Buggs and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Franco et al
as 7:2017cv00149
Plaintiff:
Kamond K Adams
Defendant:
Arlene A Franco, Brent W. Shaw, Ronny J McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollins v. Miller et al
as 2:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
Yusef Hollins
Defendant:
Brittany S Miller, Jesus Mayorga-Garcia, Kevin D Foley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Contreras v. Miller et al
as 7:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
Michael P Contreras
Defendant:
Dana L Miller, Cody S Miller, Mohamad Sarhani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. American Correctional Association et al
as 7:2013cv00039
Defendant:
American Correctional Association, Jose F. Barderas, Warden Christopher Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Arnold White, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coker v. Unknown 2 et al
as 6:2012cv00844
Plaintiff:
Ronald Ray Coker
Respondent:
Unknown 2, Unknown 1, Ms. Egan and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 75 (2) Contract - Reduction in Grade
Coker v. Unknown 2 et al
as 6:2012cv00296
Plaintiff:
Ronald Ray Coker
Defendant:
Ms. Egan, Warden C. Ginsel, Warden S. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 75 (2) Contract - Reduction in Grade
Cedric Nickerson v. TDCJ, et al
as 12-20721
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC NICKERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL MANAGED CARE PROVIDERS, ESTELLE UNIT COUNTROOM STAFF, C GINSEL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
