Cases 11 - 20 of 172
Johnson v. Fuller et al
as 9:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
DeShawn Shelton Johnson
Respondent:
Charles R Fuller and Leblanc Howard C
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Fuller et al
as 4:2022cv02910
Plaintiff:
DeShawn Shelton Johnson
Defendant:
Charles R. Fuller and Leblanc Howard C
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. USA
as 1:2022cv00299
Petitioner:
Michael Jason Shelton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Schroeder v. DHHS Executive Director et al
as 4:2022cv00637
Plaintiff:
Christopher Schroeder
Defendant:
DHHS Executive Director, Dr. Kelly R. Goodness, Flint David Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford, Sr. v. State of Mississippi et al
as 4:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Johnny V. Ford, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Hon. Mark Shelton Duncan, Steven Simeon Kilgore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Correct Care Solutions
as 5:2022cv00708
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Shelton
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Correct Care Solutions
as 6:2022cv00781
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Shelton
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Corporal Burr et al
as 4:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Johne Christopher Shelton
Defendant:
Corporal Burr, Security Officer Minyard, Security Officer King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Lt. Shelton
as 4:2022cv00845
Plaintiff:
Lamark Anthony Williams Jr.
Defendant:
Lt. Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Kent
as 22-30045
Petitioner / Appellant:
Kenneth W. Shelton
Respondent / Appellee:
Jason Kent, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
