Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Lackey v. Sims et al
as 2:2014cv00204
Plaintiff:
Raymond Willis Lackey
Defendant:
Randall Sims and NFN Woodburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banargent v. Schultz-LacKey
as 7:2012cv00103
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Banargent
Defendant:
Sarah Schultz-LacKey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Lackey v. Stephen Hurt, Sr., et al
as 12-40461
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH D. LACKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN HURT, Sr., Medical Practice Manager, W. TURNER, Nurse, Beto Unit and J. BECRAFT, Law Library Supervisor
Lackey v. Hurt et al
as 6:2010cv00689
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D Lackey
Defendant:
Stephen Hurt, Sr, W Turner and J BeCraft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2010cv00640
Defendant:
Amand Akwon, David Ankerbran, Unknown Ard and others
Plaintiff:
Kermit Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Texas Depart of Criminal Justice System & Employees et al
as 2:2009cv00245
Plaintiff:
David L Shaw
Defendant:
Texas Depart of Criminal Justice System & Employees, Brad Livingston, Brian Rodeen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lorenzo Richardson, Jr. v. Oliver, et al
as 09-40945
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORENZO RICHARDSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
OLIVER, Warden, JOHN DOE, RAMON, Officer and others
Lackey v. TDCJ-CID
as 7:2009cv00076
Plaintiff:
Randy Mack Lackey
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Oliver et al
as 9:2009cv00087
Defendant:
Unidentified Oliver, John Doe, Unidentified Ramon and others
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montenegro v. Cozbey et al
as 2:2007cv00083
Plaintiff:
Jorge Montenegro
Defendant:
Chance M Cozbey, Cristall Lindsey, NFN Lackey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
