Cases 21 - 30 of 1,358
Pena v. Salazar et al
as 5:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Nicky Pena
Defendant:
Sheriff Javier Salazar, Dr. F and University Hospital Personnel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hallman v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Robert F Hallman
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Detective McKee FNU, Ashlea Deener and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Zelaya-Funez
as 24-30120
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Victor Zelaya-Funez, also known as Victor Funes, also known as Vic F. Funes, also known as Victor.Funes3
Escalona-Reid v. Federal Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Willmer Dimitri Escalona-Reid
Defendant:
F C I Oakdale II, Federal Correctional Institution and Felipe Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mason v. Sanchez
as 24-40146
Plaintiff:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant:
R. Sanchez, K. Garza, Unknown Morchequo and others
Pena v. F C I Pollock
as 1:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Francisco Andricks Pena
Defendant:
Warden F C I Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Roberts v. Trochesset et al
as 3:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thomas Roberts
Defendant:
Sheriff Henry Trochesset, Gale Lilliman, H.C.A. (Hospital) Houston Mainland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00265
Petitioner:
Robert F Caldwell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bolden v. F B O P
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Jer'Marise Bolden
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and F B O P
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Clemons v. Lumpkin
as 24-20032
Plaintiff:
John Henry Clemons, III
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Rocky Moore, Patrick O'Daniel and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
