Cases 21 - 30 of 76
Green v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00485
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green
Defendant:
James E. Davis, Judge Jerry E. Smith, Judge Alan D. Albright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simms v. TDCJ Preston E. Smith Unit
as 5:2019cv00054
Plaintiff:
Amas Lott Simms
Defendant:
TDCJ Preston E. Smith Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simms vs Preston E. Smith Unit
as 4:2019cv00010
Plaintiff:
Amos Lott Simms
Defendant:
Preston E. Smith Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. St. Paul Travelers Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01454
Defendant:
Lyons Exit Realty Inc., Counselor Kessel, Nurse Blackmon and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond Hudmond Smith, IV and Louis Holger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Texas Health and Human Services Commission et al
as 9:2018cv00212
Defendant:
James E Smith, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Courtney Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Latroy James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Black v. Smith, III et al
as 3:2018cv00144
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Black
Defendant:
Cornelius E Smith, III, Stephen P. Henson, Veronica B Lilly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Randell Laws v. Lynn Hughes, et al
as 17-20330
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDELL GLEN LAWS
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE LYNN N. HUGHES, U.S. District Judge, JUDGE JERRY E. SMITH, JUDGE CATHARINA HAYNES and others
Johnson v. Volunteers of America et al
as 3:2016cv01379
Petitioner:
Derrick Adrian Johnson
Respondent:
Volunteers of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, J Bray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Serrano v. Smith
as 7:2016cv00013
Petitioner:
Cresencio Cano Serrano
Respondent:
James E Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pope v. Chatham et al
as 3:2016cv00101
Plaintiff:
Cecil Andrew Pope
Defendant:
Andrew Chatham, Lisa Smith, Reed Prosper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
