Cases 21 - 30 of 134
Timothy Wallace v. Ken Paxton, et al
as 18-20445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY RANDOLPH WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
KEN PAXTON, BRAD LIVINGSTON, LEON GUINN and others
Timothy Wallace v. Ken Paxton, et al
as 18-20433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY RANDOLPH WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
KEN PAXTON, Attorney General of Texas, JUDGE GUY HERMON, Travis County Probate Court No. 4, CLINTON ALEXANDER and others
Moghtader v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00632
Defendant:
Grievance Inspector J.I.E., Mark McPherson, Doctor Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Sina Moghtader
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Paxton et al
as 4:2018cv01960
Plaintiff:
Timothy Randolph Wallace
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Guy Hermon, Clinton Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jesse Curry, Jr. v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 18-20354
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESSE RANDOLPH CURRY, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Gibson v. F C I Oakdale
as 2:2018cv00092
Plaintiff:
James Randolph Gibson
Defendant:
Warden F C I Oakdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wallace v. Hughes et al
as 4:2017cv02576
Defendant:
Lynn N Hughes, Ken Paxton, Brad Livingston and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Randolph Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert v. USA
as 3:2017cv01751
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Randolph Edward Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Armstead v. Deville et al
as 2:2017cv05947
Plaintiff:
Randolph Armstead
Defendant:
Keith Deville
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Kitchen et al
as 3:2017cv00401
Plaintiff:
Carlos Williams
Defendant:
Unknown Kitchen , Unknown Randolph and Unknown Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
