Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Okafor v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2012cv00315
Plaintiff:
Bartholomew Okafor
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Eric Holder, George H. Lund, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Maxwell v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2010cv00161
Plaintiff:
Lloyd George Maxwell
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Immigration Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Valle Iglesias v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
as 2:2010cv01875
Plaintiff:
Erick Guillermo Valle Iglesias
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George Wassouf v. Robert Joilcoeur, et al
as 10-50601
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEORGE SAMIR WASSOUF
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT JOILCOEUR, District Director, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security and MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv07679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nguyen v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2009cv00202
Plaintiff:
Dung Quoc Nguyen
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
