Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Jackson v. Paxton et al
as 5:2018cv00103
Plaintiff:
Rick O Jackson
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Harold King, Curtis Bloom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Williams v. Robert Wallis
as 17-20567
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN KUNLAY WILLIAMS, also known as Kunlay Soclipu
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT A. WALLIS, Former District Director for the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Services Houston, Texas
Williams v. Wallis et al
as 4:2017cv02527
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kunlay Williams
Defendant:
Robert A. Wallis, Dr. Lloynde, Debbie Echele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mata v. Thomas et al
as 2:2016cv00223
Plaintiff:
Jesus Dominguez Mata
Defendant:
Brian Thomas, Robert Kinkaid, Wally Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallis v. Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Government President et al
as 2:2014cv02121
Plaintiff:
Reginald Wallis
Defendant:
Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Government President, Jason Dagate and Jason Lyons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earl v. Topps et al
as 2:2012cv02443
Plaintiff:
James Frank Earl
Defendant:
Demille Topps , Wally Cummings and Randy Seal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smart v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv00348
Defendant:
Jose Carrillo, Clifford Cherry, Rene Fadoua and others
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Smart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Crowe et al
as 2:2012cv01551
Plaintiff:
Percy Bengamin Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Crowe, Wally Cummins, Demille Topps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Crowe et al
as 2:2012cv01906
Plaintiff:
Percy B. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Crowe, Wally Cummins, Demille Topps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Crowe et al
as 2:2012cv01268
Plaintiff:
Eric Dewayne Jackson
Defendant:
Robert Crowe, Demille Topps and Wally Cummins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
