Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Whitten v. Rantala
as 6:2011cv00335
Plaintiff:
Eddie Ray Whitten
Defendant:
David Rantala
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitten v. City of Dallas Police Department
as 3:2011cv00534
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Whitten
Defendant:
City of Dallas Police Department, J. Sanderlin, David Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert McIntosh v. Raymond Thompson, et al
as 11-40254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MCINTOSH
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND THOMPSON, Warden, D WHITTEN, Property Officer, DAN GANNON, Law Library Supervisor and others
Roney v. Flowers et al
as 6:2011cv00093
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shante Roney
Defendant:
Unknown Flowers, Derrick Whitten, Unknown Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Golden v. Box et al
as 4:2011cv00042
Plaintiff:
Willie Ray Golden
Defendant:
Terry Box, Jason Whitten, Adrian Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willie Golden v. Doug Kowaiski, et al
as 10-41101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE RAY GOLDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUG KOWAISKI, Chief of Police, McKinney Police Department, JOE ARP, Detective, McKinney Police Department, MARCUS D. NORMAN, Attorney at Law and others
Golden v Kowaiski, et al
as 4:2010cv00353
Plaintiff:
Willie Ray Golden
Defendant:
Doug Kowaiski, Joe Arp, Marcus D. Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Dickerson et al
as 1:2010cv00321
Plaintiff:
Robert L Burns
Defendant:
James Dickerson, Stephen Whitten, Glen Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McIntosh v. Thompson et al
as 6:2009cv00444
Plaintiff:
Robert McIntosh
Defendant:
Raymond Thompson, D Whitten, Dan Gannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swinford v. Whitten et al
as 3:2009cv00062
Plaintiff:
James Swinford, Jr.
Defendant:
Jimmy Dean Whitten and Union County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
