Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Camacho v. Limestone County Detention Center et al
as 6:2014cv00208
Defendant:
B.O.P. and Limestone County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Sirilo Alvarez Camacho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Spence v. Wallace Nelson, et al
as 14-10306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES CLIFFORD SPENCE, also known as James Spence
Defendant - Appellee:
WALLACE NELSON, Chaplain III, Region VI, also known as Wallace Nelson, III, SHABAZZ, Chaplain, BILL PIERCE, Director of Chaplaincy and others
Ramos Camacho v. USA
as 5:2013cv00195
Petitioner:
Yuriria Sarai Ramos Camacho
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Camacho v. Rosales
as 4:2013cv00061
Plaintiff:
Luis Raul Camacho
Defendant:
Matthew K. Rosales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oguntodu v. Rouse et al
as 1:2013cv00113
Plaintiff:
Joseph Oye Oguntodu
Defendant:
Tammie Rouse, Bonnie I. Young, Lizeka R Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Camacho v. MDOC et al
as 3:2013cv00216
Plaintiff:
Kathy Sue Hale Camacho
Defendant:
MDOC, State of Mississippi, Jim Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oguntodu v. Rosenbaum et al
as 1:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
Joseph Oye Oguntodu
Defendant:
Pearl Rosenbaum, Tony Senders, Teresa Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Juilo Camacho v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 13-20046
Petitioner - Appellant:
JUILO VASQUEZ CAMACHO
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Camacho v. MDOC et al
as 3:2013cv00023
Petitioner:
Kathy Sue Camacho
Respondent:
MDOC and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Camacho v. Thaler
as 4:2012cv03418
Petitioner:
Juilo Vasquez Camacho
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
