Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Wiley v. Caldwell et al
as 3:2013cv00388
Respondent:
22th J.D.C. Clerk, James Caldwell, R. Kramer and others
Petitioner:
Constance T. Kador and Christopher George Wiley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Demos, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 13-60231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
Waldman v. United States of America
as 3:2013cv00107
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
John Robert Waldman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
John Wilkerson v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 13-40176
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT WILKERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Demos v. U.S. Secretary of Defense
as 3:2013cv00025
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
U.S. Secretary of Defense
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Demos v. CIA Director et al
as 3:2013cv00128
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
CIA Director, Governor of Texas and U.S. Secretary of Defense
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Demos v. The U.S. Secretary of Defense et al
as 5:2012mc01217
Defendant:
C.I.A. Director, President Barack H. Obama, The Governor of the State of Washington and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Demos, Jr. v. Daniel Clark, et al
as 12-30973
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL CLARK and NATCHITOCHES COUNTY
John Demos, Jr. v. Daniel Clark, et al
as 12-30835
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL CLARK and NATCHITOCHES COUNTY
Demos v. Clark et al
as 3:2012cv01946
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Daniel Clark and Natchitoches County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
