Cases 31 - 40 of 364
Ramos v. Lumpkin
as 22-20546
Petitioner / Appellant:
Alfredo Ramos
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Courtois v. Lt. Elizondo et al
as 5:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Andre J. Courtois
Defendant:
Lt. Elizondo, Sgt. Ramos and Medical Personal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Schaefer v. Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv00436
Plaintiff:
Jason Paul Schaefer
Defendant:
Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, FNU Dobbs, FNU Blackman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cobb v. Klein et al
as 2:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
Gulian Cobb
Defendant:
Judge Inna Klein and Laura Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tapia v. USA
as 3:2022cv02221
Petitioner:
Rosalio Ramos Tapia
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Turnine v. Linthicum et al
as 2:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
Henry Hernandez Turnine
Defendant:
Lannette Linthicum, TDCJ Medical Department and Nalva Gonzales Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turnine v. Linthicum et al
as 7:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Henry Hernandez Turnine
Defendant:
Lannette Linthicum, TDCJ Medical Department and Nalva Gonzales Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godwin v. BOP Director et al
as 1:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Roger Godwin
Defendant:
BOP Director, Dr. Luis Ramos, FNU Franks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rubio v. Norton et al
as 1:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Juan Rubio
Defendant:
Felipe Ochoa, Gregory Parks, Joe Ramos, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos Estrada v. Bexar County Jail et al
as 5:2022cv00855
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Ramos Estrada
Defendant:
Bexar County Jail, Javier Salazar and Mary Angie Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
