Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 134
Wallace v. Paxton et al
as 4:2016cv02827
Plaintiff: Timothy Randolph Wallace
Defendant: Ken Paxton, Brad Livingston, Leon Guinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Livingston
as 3:2016cv02179
Petitioner: Timothy Randolph Wallace
Respondent: Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Laphand v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv01971
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Carter Randolph Laphand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Wallace v. Herring et al
as 3:2016cv01564
Plaintiff: Timothy Randolph Wallace
Defendant: John H Herring, William Gonzalez, Jane or John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Stephens, Director, TDCJ-ID et al
as 1:2016cv00006
Plaintiff: Timothy Randolph Wallace
Defendant: William Stephens, Director, TDCJ-ID and William Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv07178
Plaintiff: Clarence Randolph, Jr.
Defendant: Burl Cain
Respondent: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Randolph Nobles v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-51118
Petitioner - Appellant: RANDOLPH LEE NOBLES
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Poudoo v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2015cv00232
Petitioner: Randolph Poudoo
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Poudoo v. Director, TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2015cv00107
Petitioner: Randolph Poudoo
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bryant v. Stephens
as 6:2015cv00176
Petitioner: Clarence Randolph Bryant
Notice Only Party: Laura Haney
Respondent: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?