Cases 41 - 50 of 1,353
Barker-Hernandez v. Martinez
as 2:2023cv01267
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Barker-Hernandez
Defendant:
F Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ruiz-Esparza v. F C I Pollock
as 1:2023cv01254
Plaintiff:
Erick Ruiz-Esparza
Defendant:
Warden F C I Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Byrd v. Lane et al
as 6:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
David B Byrd
Respondent:
Darron A Lane, Jr, Homes L Sandles and Fernand F Fafso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Byrd v. Lane et al
as 9:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
David B Byrd
Defendant:
Darron A Lane, Jr, Homes L Sandles and Fernand F Fafso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Byrd v. Lane et al
as 4:2023cv03299
Plaintiff:
David B Byrd
Defendant:
Darron A Lane, Jr, Homes L Sandles and Fernand F Fafso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Vargas v. Martinez
as 2:2023cv01208
Plaintiff:
Victor C Vargas and Victor Candelario Vargas
Defendant:
F Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stafford v. Zwicke
as 23-50623
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tyrone Stafford
Defendant / Appellee:
Arnold S. Zwicke, Executive Sheriff, Guadalupe County Sheriff's Office, Magistrate Judges, Guadalupe County, County/District Attorney, Guadalupe County and others
Valencia-Adata v. F C I Oakdale II
as 2:2023cv01164
Plaintiff:
Cruz Eduardo Valencia-Adata
Defendant:
Warden F C I Oakdale II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mungaray v. Collier
as 23-50595
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jorge Mungaray
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, C. F. Hazelwood and others
Caballero v. Alexandria Regn Med Ctr
as 23-30576
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Saul Caballero
Defendant / Appellee:
Alexandria Regional Medical Center Eye Clinic, Dr. Braud, Regional Medical Center Eye Clinic in Alexandria, John Does, 1-5 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
