Cases 41 - 50 of 2,152
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-20160
Petitioner:
Ernesto Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40235
Petitioner:
Pedro Enrique Barzola Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Cruz-Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-70003
Petitioner:
Obel Cruz-Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Garcia v. Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ:
as 6:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
Antonio A Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
English v. The United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv01321
Petitioner:
James-Thomas English
Respondent:
The United States of America, Montgomery County Courthouse & the of Texas & U, U. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garcia v. Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ:
as 2:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Antonio A Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00372
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. TDCJ-ID, Disciplinary Department
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
TDCJ-ID, Disciplinary Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Guadalupe County District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bodwin v. Collier
as 24-40213
Plaintiff:
Joseph Clyde Bodwin
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Juan M. Garcia, Michael O. McNeil and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
