Cases 41 - 50 of 256
Johnson v. Rosenthal
as 23-20105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. Wayne Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Lee Rosenthal, United States District Judge, Keith Ellison, United States District Judge, Lynn Hughes, United States District Judge and others
Thacker v. Abott et al
as 4:2023cv00966
Plaintiff:
David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Defendant:
Gregg Abott, Ken Paxton, Lisa McMinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Summers v. Collier et al
as 1:2022cv00605
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leon Summers
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Oscar Mendoza, Stephen Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Collier et al
as 1:2022cv00586
Plaintiff:
Reuben Reed
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Oscar Mendoza, Jessica Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirkland v. Paxton et al
as 4:2022cv01102
Plaintiff:
Clay Jarrad Kirkland
Defendant:
Ken Paxton and Thu Thai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. TDCJ
as 22-11125
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Geoffrey Peters, also known as Michael G. Peters
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Ken Paxton and Greg Abbott
Calhoun v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01185
Petitioner:
Dean Edward Calhoun
Respondent:
Warden FNU Delap, Ken Paxton and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calhoun v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01195
Petitioner:
Dean Edward Calhoun
Respondent:
Warden FNU Delap, Ken Paxton and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burkeen v. Paxton
as 4:2022cv00941
Plaintiff:
Dell Burkeen, II
Defendant:
Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cervantez v. Collier et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Maria Cervantez and Maria Concepcion Valenzuela Cervantez
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Cris Love, Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
