Cases 41 - 50 of 1,591
Thomas v. Morton et al
as 2:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Dr. Gary Morton, Sr. Warden Adrian Amonett, Dr. Lanette Linthicum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherman v. Thibodaux Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv06833
Plaintiff:
Craig James Sherman, Sr
Defendant:
Thibodaux Police Department and Jason Slosarex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepherd v. TDCJ et al
as 1:2023cv00397
Plaintiff:
Kernelius Marquis Shepherd, Sr.
Defendant:
TDCJ and UTMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. Collier et al
as 7:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cobb
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Warden J Smith, Sr and Sgt. Rushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. Collier et al;
as 2:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cobb
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ Bryan Collier, Warden J Smith, Sr and Sgt. Rushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph v. Jefferson
as 23-40615
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Demetrius Sherman Joseph, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
William R. Jefferson, Jr., Christopher A. Wood, Mark A. Callahan and others
Washington v. Unknown Defendant
as 23-40616
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tony Washington, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Unknown Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Joseph v. Dickerson et al
as 9:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Sherman Joseph, Sr
Defendant:
John Dickerson, Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Devaney v. Blankenship et al
as 4:2023cv01052
Plaintiff:
David Allen Devaney, Sr.
Defendant:
Chief FNU Blankenship, Captain FNU Gordy, Sgt. FNU Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
