Cases 51 - 60 of 62
James Davis v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-40264
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAM DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Norsworthy v. Thaler
as 1:2009cv01015
Petitioner:
James William Norsworthy
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norsworthy v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00902
Petitioner:
James William Norsworthy
Respondent:
Nathanial Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norsworthy v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00849
Petitioner:
James William Norsworthy
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00589
Petitioner:
James William Thompson
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2009cv00243
Petitioner:
James William Davis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hearron v. Williams et al
as 4:2009cv00033
Plaintiff:
Khristoffer Mandell Hearron
Defendant:
James Williams, Chief Hassell, Raymond Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randle v. Williams et al
as 4:2009cv00027
Plaintiff:
Monroe B. Randle
Defendant:
James Williams, Sadie Maggitt, Shaquilla Payne and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Quarterman
as 3:2007cv01263
Petitioner:
Edward James Williams
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edmonson v. Ishee, et al
as 2:2007cv00046
Plaintiff:
Kenny F. Edmonson
Defendant:
Matt Ishee, Larry Dykes, Jones County Board of Supervisors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
