Cases 51 - 60 of 172
Falkenhorst, III v. H.C.C.P.S. et al
as 4:2017cv00242
Plaintiff:
Rainer Eric Nikolaus Falkenhorst
Defendant:
H.C.C.P.S., Patrick S. Shelton, Gregg Abott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry Hinton, Jr. v. The State of Mississippi
as 17-60027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY HINTON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELTON JOLLIFF, Agent Acting on Behalf of the Bureau
Woods v. City of Natchez Police Department, et al
as 5:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Casey Shelton Woods
Defendant:
City of Natchez Police Department, Mack James, Danny White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dewayne Shelton v. Janelle Holloway, et al
as 16-11558
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEWAYNE MARKS SHELTON, also known as Dewayne Shelton
Defendant - Appellee:
JANELLE C. HOLLOWAY, CO IV, JULIE M. EVANS, Counsel Substitute, VICKIE D. BROWN, Counsel Substitute and others
Shelton v. King et al
as 2:2016cv00224
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Marks Shelton
Defendant:
Timothy A King, H Gratz, Erion J Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dewayne Shelton v. J. Anderson, et al
as 16-11431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEWAYNE SHELTON
Defendant - Appellee:
J. ANDERSON, Correctional Officer IV, RAYMOND C. PICKARD, Sergeant, TERRY D. RAINS, Captain and others
Cooke v. Lane et al
as 6:2016cv00347
Defendant:
Officer Linda Basquez, Sheriff Eddie Lange, Cpl. Jerry Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Dennis Cooke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cristobal Orozco v. City of Angleton, et al
as 16-20448
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRISTOBAL MORENO OROZCO
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ANGLETON, JUDGE ROBERT E. MAY, VON H. SHELTON, Attorney and others
Shelton v. Alford
as 3:2016cv01944
Petitioner:
Anthony Tad Shelton
Respondent:
Bob L Alford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Orozco v. City of Angleton et al
as 4:2016cv01868
Plaintiff:
Cristobal Moreno Orozco
Defendant:
City of Angleton, Robert E. May, Von H. Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
