Cases 61 - 70 of 1,525
McGee v. Armstrong
as 23-50571
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rickey L. McGee
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden Bruce L. Armstrong, Major Michael Voyles, Major Treyvon Hoecult and others
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00115
Petitioner:
Armando Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Toson v. Merchant
as 23-10800
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Durand Toson
Defendant / Appellee:
Alan W. Merchant, Captain, Robertson Unit, Dakota Thornton, Captain, Robertson Unit, John Doe #1, Unit Classification Committee, Robertson Unit and others
Martinez v. Warden B. Rodriguez
as 6:2023cv00371
Petitioner:
Michael Martinez
Defendant:
Warden B. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Warden B. Rodriguez
as 1:2023cv00862
Petitioner:
Michael Martinez
Defendant:
Warden B. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00738
Plaintiff:
Hector Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America and F.J. Garrido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Whatley v Cricket Wireless et al
as 4:2023cv02611
Plaintiff:
Joaquin Whatley
Defendant:
Cricket Wireless, Jaqueline Rodriguez, Heather Rose Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Palomo et al
as 1:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Armando Gomez
Defendant:
Jacobb Palomo, Castorena, Jose Ibarra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Rodriguez, et al.
as 5:2023cv00896
Plaintiff:
Lowell Green
Defendant:
Judge Xavier Rodriguez, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez, Jr. v. USA
as 4:2023cv00695
Petitioner:
Fidel Rodriguez, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
