Cases 71 - 80 of 213
Garrison v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2014cv01832
Petitioner:
Clyde Garrison
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Goffney v. Koomer et al
as 4:2014cv00733
Plaintiff:
Nikita Van Goffney
Defendant:
Martha D. Koomer, Cassandra McCoy, Michael T. Seiler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. USA
as 4:2014cv00112
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jimmie Clyde Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Pines v. Hurst et al
as 3:2014cv00066
Defendant:
Cindy Hooge, Cliff Hurst, James LeBlanc and others
Interested Party:
William Kline
Plaintiff:
Micheal W. Pines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nubine v. Chapa et al
as 4:2014cv00193
Petitioner:
Clyde Nubine
Respondent:
Jose Chapa, John Doe, Erick Echavarry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clyde Evans v. Greg Abbott, et al
as 13-11176
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLYDE DALE EVANS
Respondent - Appellee:
GREG ABBOTT, CLAUDE MAYE, Warden for USP Leavenworth and WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Nubine v. Stephens
as 4:2013cv02633
Petitioner:
Clyde Nubine
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Willis v. Evans et al
as 4:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
Derrick Willis
Defendant:
Charles Doug Evans, Clyde Hill, Clarence E. Morgan, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mainer v. Stephens
as 4:2013cv01861
Petitioner:
Clyde Mainer
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMillen v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv01912
Petitioner:
Robert Clyde McMillen
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
