Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 9,217
Belmont v. Lumpkin
as 24-50102
Petitioner: Jose Carlos Belmont
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Puente v. Lumpkin
as 24-40190
Petitioner: Luis Fernando Puente
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Banks v. Lumpkin
as 24-50092
Petitioner: Jakroi Allen Banks
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Kie v. Lumpkin
as 24-40193
Petitioner: Michael Wayne Kie
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Wells v. Lumpkin
as 24-70002
Petitioner: Amos Wells
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Guzman v. Lumpkin
as 24-40186
Petitioner: Jose Garduno Guzman
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Little v. Lumpkin
as 24-10121
Petitioner: Paul La'Mark Little
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Pacheco-Morales v. Collier
as 24-40050
Plaintiff: Hector Pacheco-Morales
Defendant: Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division, Don Briscoe, FNU Norsworthy, Senior Warden and others
Busby v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 6:2024cv00116
Plaintiff: Wyatt Busby
Defendant: Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Lumpkin
as 24-10244
Petitioner: Deondray Raymond Mason
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?