Cases 1 - 10 of 165,468
Esteban-Bravo v. Yazoo City USP et al
as 3:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Tirso Esteban-Bravo
Defendant:
Yazoo City USP and FCI Warden
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Parks v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00544
Petitioner:
Luther Dwayne Parks
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. Fletcher
as 6:2024cv00183
Petitioner:
Enrique A. Diaz
Respondent:
Sheriff Brandon Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Frankenfield v. Galveston County et al
as 9:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Defendant:
Galveston County, Kate Willis, John Kinnard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. UFN
as 9:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Marion Ray Mosley
Defendant:
ULN UFN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv01943
Petitioner:
Eryc Jarrod Henderson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Flores v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01244
Petitioner:
Richard Louis Flores
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Other:
Gregory M Fowler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boswell v. State of Texas
as 3:2024cv01255
Petitioner:
Avery S Boswell
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
