Cases 1 - 10 of 663
Barber v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Terry Lynn Barber
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Tate Reeves, Lynn Fitch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Garcia et al
as 3:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Stewart
Defendant:
S. Garcia, Salvador Chapa, Eulalia Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Texas City Police Officer et al
as 4:2024cv01758
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Stewart
Defendant:
Texas City Police Oficer and Texas City Police Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Harris County Sheriff's Office Jail
as 4:2024cv01408
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Stewart
Defendant:
Harris County Sheriff's Office Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Jackson et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Anthony Deundra Wilson
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Jackson, Security Warden Unknown Andrews, Chief Unknown Perry and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Rayford
as 4:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stewart
Defendant:
Dan Rayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Rayford
as 6:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stewart
Defendant:
Dan Rayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Cooley
as 24-30152
Petitioner:
Rolondo Stewart
Respondent:
Keith Cooley, Warden, Allen Correctional Center
Stewart v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
Joshua Lynn Stewart
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00805
Petitioner:
Joshua Lynn Stewart
Respondent:
Brian Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
