Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Milton v. State of Texas 272nd District Court et al
as 4:2024cv01846
Plaintiff:
Emanuel A. Milton
Defendant:
State of Texas 272nd District Court, Brazos County District Attorney, Officer Maldanado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez-Camela v. Martinez
as 2:2023cv01126
Plaintiff:
Bruno Ramirez-Camela and Bruno Freddy Ramirez-Camela
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00268
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gonzalez-Garcia v. USA
as 3:2022cv01383
Petitioner:
Bruno Manuel Gonzalez-Garcia
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Collins v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services et al
as 5:2019cv00219
Defendant:
Emily Turner, Matthew Harris Law, PLLC, Deidre Ward and others
Plaintiff:
Bennie L. Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Velasquez v. Warden, FCI Big Spring
as 6:2019cv00041
Petitioner:
Bruno Rudolfo Velasquez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Big Spring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bruno v. United States of America et al
as 3:2018cv00681
Plaintiff:
Hector Bruno
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
United States of America and R. Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Thompson v. Bruno
as 4:2018cv02665
Defendant:
M Bruno
Plaintiff:
Lastersteen Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Harris County Sheriff's Office
as 4:2018cv02548
Plaintiff:
Lastersteen Tony Thompson
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, Harris County Sheriff's Office and Sheriff Ed Gonzalez
Consolidated Defendant:
M Bruno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Glenn v. Bruno et al
as 4:2015cv03267
Plaintiff:
Christopher Glenn
Defendant:
Steve Bruno, Walker County Jail and Keith Dehart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
