Cases 1 - 10 of 165,539
Sims v. USA
as 3:2024cv01350
Petitioner:
Ladavid Sims
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Byrd v. Woodburn et al
as 2:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Norman Lashan Byrd
Defendant:
Douglas Woodburn, Timothy Wade Burson, Ana Esteves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richards v. Schmoker
as 5:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
James Richards
Respondent:
Wayne Schmoker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2024cv00103
Petitioner:
Derrick Nelson
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Skyberg v. Newman et al
as 4:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Jason Skyberg
Defendant:
Brian J. Newman and Tarrant County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Bishop et al
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Demond Lamont Wilson
Defendant:
Ricky Bishop, Calvin Abor, FNU Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans Jr. v. Lumpkin Case electronically transferred to Eastern District of Texas- Tyler.
as 6:2024cv00186
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Evans Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coppola v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
William Coppola and Iron Thunderhorse
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Sheriff, Jefferson County
as 1:2024cv00193
Petitioner:
Thomas C. Baker
Respondent:
Sheriff, Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Perry Jackson
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
