Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Boykin v. Liddell El Bey
as 4:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
Torey Boykin
Defendant:
Tony Liddell El Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis-Bey v. Cox
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Carlos Devon Lewis-Bey
Defendant:
J W Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
El-Bey v. Lumpkin
as 24-10303
Petitioner:
Gary Dion Allen El-Bey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Lewisbey v. Corunjal et al
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
David Lewis Bey and David Lewisbey
Defendant:
Michael D Corunjal, FNU Stearns, D Freshour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Jones et al
as 6:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Marcus Scott and Marcus Scott Bey
Defendant:
Unknown Jones, Albert Arnold, Sgt Larry Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El Shabazz Bey v. Tang
as 23-40334
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mustafa El Shabazz Bey, also known as Noland Roosevelt Byrd
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Tang, Police Officer - Plano Police Department and Greg Willis, Criminal District Attorney - Collin County District Attorney's Office
McGee v. Darrington Unit
as 4:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Eric Jervon McGee
Defendant:
Darrington Unit, Major Frederick Gooden, Sgt Oki Bey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey v. Delgado et al
as 3:2023cv00454
Plaintiff:
Mustafa el Shabazz Bey and Noland Byrd
Defendant:
NFN Delgado, S Keen and R Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El Shabazz Bey v. Tang et al
as 4:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Mustafa El Shabazz Bey and Noland Roosevelt Byrd
Defendant:
Michael Tang and Greg Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey v. Stearns
as 1:2023cv00036
Petitioner:
David Lewis Bey
Respondent:
C Stearns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
