Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Caballero v. McClanaham et al
as 5:2024cv00188
Defendant:
Patricia McClanaham and FNU Rebber
Plaintiff:
Edgar Caballero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newson v. Newson et al
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Devoris Newson
Defendant:
Tanzania Newson, Captain Wilcox, Governor of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caballero v. Alexandria Regn Med Ctr
as 23-30576
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Saul Caballero
Defendant / Appellee:
Alexandria Regional Medical Center Eye Clinic, Dr. Braud, Regional Medical Center Eye Clinic in Alexandria, John Does, 1-5 and others
Caballero v. Alexandria Regional Medical Center Eye Clinic et al
as 2:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Saul Caballero
Defendant:
Alexandria Regional Medical Center Eye Clinic, Dr Braud, Jhon Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Caballero v. Lumpkin
as 22-50931
Petitioner / Appellant:
Juan L. Caballero
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Caballero v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2022cv00916
Petitioner:
Juan L Caballero
Respondent:
Major Bobby Lumpkin and Jerry Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caballero v. Lumpkin et al
as 2:2022cv00155
Petitioner:
Juan L Caballero
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin and Jerry Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cabellero v. USA
as 3:2022cv00616
Petitioner:
Christian Caballero
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Caballero v. USA
as 3:2022cv00389
Petitioner:
David Caballero
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Antonio M. Caballero v. Bobby Lumpkin
as 5:2021cv00933
Petitioner:
Antonio M Caballero and Antonio M. Caballero
Respondent:
Major Bobby Lumpkin and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
