Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Dean-Mitchell v. Reese et al
as 2:2010cv00026
Plaintiff:
Wallace Dean-Mitchell
Defendant:
Constance Reese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Richardson v. Chambers et al
as 5:2006cv00101
Plaintiff:
Michael David Richardson
Defendant:
A. Chambers, Vickie Owens, Mary Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Walker v. Reese, et al
as 08-60994
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN C WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
CONSTANCE REESE, Warden, Individual and Official Capacity, SCOTT FISHER, Associate Warden, Individual Capacity, ANTHONY CHAMBERS, Clinical Director, Individual Capacity and others
Mayberry v. Doe, et al
as 08-41107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUNE MAYBERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, Staff Member, HANCOCK, Lieutenant and CONSTANCE REESE
Thomas v. Reese, et al
as 08-60951
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
CONSTANCE REESE, in her Individual Capacity as a Federal Officer, JULIE D SOUTHERLAND, in her Individual Capacity as a Federal Officer and Z PLEASANT, in her Individual Capacity as a Federal Officer
Ruiz v. Reese et al
as 5:2008cv00267
Plaintiff:
Eddie Nelson Ruiz
Defendant:
Constance Reese, Russell Perdue, M. Blow and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Retana v. Reese, et al
as 5:2008cv00278
Plaintiff:
Enrique Mendoza Retana
Defendant:
Constance Reese, T. Matthews, B. Tanner and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sanchez v. Reese et al
as 5:2008cv00211
Plaintiff:
Espinoza Sanchez
Defendant:
Constance Reese, Russell Perdue, Roy C. Cheatham and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Esquivel v. Reese et al
as 5:2008cv00242
Plaintiff:
Roberto Cabrera Esquivel
Defendant:
Constance Reese, Russell Perdue, Roy C. Cheatham and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
