Cases 1 - 10 of 22
James v. E Baton Rouge City Prsh
as 24-30318
Plaintiff:
Michael A. James, real party in interest Conner A. James
Defendant:
East Baton Rouge City Parish, Sid J. Gautreaux, III, Joshua Clark and others
James v. Gautreaux
as 23-30463
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael A. James
Defendant / Appellee:
Sheriff Sid J. Gautreaux, III and United States DEA
James v. East Baton Rouge City Parish et al
as 3:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Michael A. James and Conner A. James
Defendant:
East Baton Rouge City Parish, Sid J. Gautreaux, III, Joshua Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
James v. Gautreaux et al
as 3:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Michael A. James
Defendant:
Sid J. Gautreaux, III and United States DEA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Clark
as 22-30806
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael A. James
Defendant / Appellee:
Joshua Clark, Jordan Webb, Nathan Harrison and others
James et al v. Clark et al
as 3:2022cv00604
Plaintiff:
Michael A. James, Conner A. James, Michael A James, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Joshua Clark, Jordan Webb, Nathan Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stoneham v. DeLeon et al
as 5:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
Frank Stoneham
Defendant:
Michael DeLeon, Velia Meza, District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pham v. Unidentified DEA Agent et al
as 2:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
Thuy Xuam Pham
Defendant:
Agent DEA Officer and Captain DEA Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pham v. Unidentified DEA Agent et al
as 5:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Thuy Xuam Pham
Defendant:
Unidentified DEA Agent and Unidentified Captain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Crane et al
as 7:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Geovani Hernandez
Defendant:
Randy Crane, Kristen Joy Rees, James Sturgis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
