Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Cruz v. USA
as 4:2024cv00415
Petitioner:
Ivan Dejesus Suastes Cruz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Alonzo et al v. Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium, et al
as 1:2022cv01588
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alonzo, Jaun Frausto, Bairo Cardona Perez and others
Defendant:
Warden Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium and Federal Correctional Institution Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
DeJesus v. Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium, et al
as 1:2022cv01799
Plaintiff:
Abdiel DeJesus
Defendant:
Warden Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium and Federal Correctional Institution Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Guel-Rivas v. Lumpkin
as 6:2022cv00514
Petitioner:
Jose DeJesus Guel-Rivas
Respondent:
Phonso J. Rayford and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guel-Rivas v. Lumpkin
as 1:2022cv00482
Petitioner:
Jose DeJesus Guel-Rivas
Respondent:
Phonso J. Rayford and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00126
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nelson Hernandez v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-41024
Petitioner - Appellant:
NELSON DEJESUS HERNANDEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Jose Dejesus Alonso v. USA
as 4:2016cv00504
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose DeJesus Alonso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Trinidad v. United States Of America
as 5:2016cv00138
Plaintiff:
Manuel Dejesus Trinidad
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DeJesus v. Director TDCJ
as 9:2014cv00066
Petitioner:
Homar A DeJesus
Respondent:
Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
