Cases 1 - 10 of 901
Hill v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00447
Petitioner:
Douglas Eric Hill
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Wal-Mart, et al.
as 4:2024cv00616
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Inc, Wal-Mart, Sam Club and others
Plaintiff:
James Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDaniel v. Latten et al
as 6:2024cv00354
Defendant:
Mr. FNU Bledsoe, Conner Turner, Dep. Dalton DeHerrera and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Brenton McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Hill County Sheriff's Office et al
as 6:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lashun Hicks
Defendant:
Hill County Sheriff's Office, Hill County Jail and Dalvin Rubio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashley v. Pool et al
as 5:2024cv00824
Defendant:
L Hill and B Pool
Plaintiff:
Donald Ashley, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Wal-Mart et al
as 3:2024cv01380
Plaintiff:
James Hill
Defendant:
Sam Club, Wal-Mart Inc and Wal-Mart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kemp v. Washington et al
as 5:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
Cameron Kemp
Defendant:
Ladarriea Hill, Tevis Washington, Shreveport Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. The United States of America
as 4:2024cv02104
Respondent:
The United States of America
Petitioner:
Marc Anthony Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hill v. Calhoun
as 3:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Cedric Hill
Defendant:
Ward Calhoun
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moncrief v. Public Defender's Office
as 6:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
Damien Rashad Moncrief
Defendant:
Public Defenders Office, Craig King, Anna Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
