Cases 1 - 10 of 427
Reese v. Martinez
as 24-50470
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Reese
Defendant:
Annette Martinez, Warden, Jodi Sawyer, T. Matz and others
Hughes v. Bobby Lumpkin et al
as 4:2024cv02178
Plaintiff:
Darren Tranell Hughes
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Harris County, Fort Bend County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Captain Gipson et al
as 9:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Charles Harold Hughes
Defendant:
Captain Gibson, Sgt Sykes and Office of the Attorney General - Amicus Curiae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01897
Petitioner:
Darren Tramell Hughes
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castro v. Wallace
as 24-50379
Plaintiff:
Hubert Edward Castro
Defendant:
Warden Darren Wallace, TDCJ Hughes Unit, in his Individual and Official Capacity, Assistant Warden Toby Powell, TDCJ Hughes Unit, in his Individual and Official Capacity, Chimdi Akwitti and others
Hancock v. Fuller
as 4:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Hancock
Defendant:
Hugh Alexander Fuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Mark Lyle Bell
Defendant:
Asst. Warden Kamilah Coger, Joy Hughes, Todd Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Guidroz et al
as 6:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Harold Hughes, Jr
Defendant:
Bobby Guidroz, Jessie Bellard, J Pickens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00479
Petitioner:
Darren Tramell Hughes
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. TDCJ
as 24-20097
Plaintiff:
William Scott Garrison
Defendant:
TDCJ Mail Grievance Department, Alfred Hughes Unit Grievance Department, Bambi Kiser, TDCJ Media Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
