Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Williams v. Moore
as 23-50614
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Bernard Williams, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Hon. Jefferson Moore, Hon. Kristina Escalona, Hon. Ron Rangel and others
Williams v. Moore et al
as 5:2023cv00770
Plaintiff:
John Bernard Williams, III
Defendant:
Hon. Jefferson Moore, Hon. Kristina Escalona, Hon. Ron Rangel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Rivers
as 3:2022cv01894
Petitioner:
John Williams and John D Williams
Respondent:
FNU Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Williams v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 7:2020cv00148
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
John Derreck Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00075
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Williams v. FCI Otisville
as 1:2019cv00601
Respondent:
FCI Otisville
Petitioner:
John William Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 4:2018cv00964
Respondent:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Petitioner:
John William Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Underwood
as 3:2018cv01298
Petitioner:
John D Williams
Respondent:
M Underwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2010cv01521
Plaintiff:
John Freeman Williams
Defendant:
Louisiana State
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Williams v. Certain Individuals Employees, et al
as 09-20470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PHILLIPS WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS EMPLOYEES OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE - INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION AT THE JESTER III UNIT, RICHMOND, TEXAS, JANE DOE, State Employee, Jester 3, JOHN OR JANE DOE, Texas Department of Criminal Justice/University of Texas Medical Branch Employee Jester 3 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.