Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Horace v. London
as 23-20476
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joe Frank Horace, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Gregory London, Nurse and Kolton Stoker, Sr., Practice Manager
Horace v. London et al
as 4:2022cv02532
Plaintiff:
Joe Frank Horace, Sr.
Defendant:
Gregory London and Kolton Stoker, Sr.
Amicus Curiae:
Office of the Attorney General as Amicus Curiae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00087
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Joe Frank Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Quinones v. Garza et al
as 2:2019cv00190
Plaintiff:
Manuel Quinones, Jr
Defendant:
Joe Frank Garza, Sean Wymore, Woody Densen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinones v. Garza et al
as 1:2019cv00257
Plaintiff:
Manuel Quinones, Jr
Defendant:
Joe Frank Garza, Sean Wymore, Woody Densen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Horace, Sr. v. William Stephens, Director
as 13-41037
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOE FRANK HORACE, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Horace v. Thaler
as 1:2010cv00419
Petitioner:
Joe Frank Horace, Sr
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joe Castro v. George Zoley, et al
as 09-10231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE FRANK CASTRO
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE ZOLEY, CEO-GEO Group, Inc., DAVID MCCOMIS, Facility Administrator, Sanders Estes Unit, MICHAEL G RINGER, Assistant Facility Administrator, Sanders Estes Unit and others
Castro v. Zoley et al
as 3:2008cv01776
Plaintiff:
Joe Frank Castro
Defendant:
George Zoley, David McComis, Michael G. Ringer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Forrest County Sheriff's Department
as 2:2008cv00008
Plaintiff:
Joe Frank Jones
Defendant:
Forrest County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
