Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Armour v. TX Board of Pardons
as 24-40347
Plaintiff:
Artis Armour
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, David Gutierriez, Paul Keil and others
James v. Guiterriez et al
as 1:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Michael C James
Defendant:
David Guiterriez, Ressie Owens, Paul Keil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. TX Board of Pardon
as 22-40765
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Norris Hicks
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas Board of Pardon and Paroles, each member in official capacity, David Guiterriez, Chairman, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Ressie Owens, Chairman, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and others
Keil v. McCain et al
as 2:2018cv09410
Plaintiff:
Curtis Antoine Keil and Curtis Antione Keil
Defendant:
Sandy McCain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Keil v. Hanson
as 2:2015cv00422
Plaintiff:
Curtis Antione Keil
Defendant:
Ray Hanson
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Keil v. Richwood Correctional Center
as 5:2014cv03503
Plaintiff:
Curtis Antione Keil
Defendant:
Warden Richwood Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Elliott v. Crain et al
as 6:2008cv00497
Petitioner:
George Abbott Elliott
Respondent:
Christina M Crain
Defendant:
Rissi Owens, Stuart Jenkins, Brad Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Keil v. Beaumont Police Department et al
as 1:2007cv00579
Plaintiff:
Clarence Wayne Keil
Defendant:
Beaumont Police Department and Steven Upshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keil v. Barlow
as 1:2007cv00269
Plaintiff:
Clarence Wayne Keil
Defendant:
David W Barlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keil v. Naphcare Medical Contractor
as 1:2007cv00282
Plaintiff:
Clarence Wayne Keil
Defendant:
Naphcare Medical Contractor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
