Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Kemper v. United States of America
as 5:2017cv00325
Plaintiff:
Alta Lee Kemper
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Christopher Benoman v. Johnny Crockett, Warden
as 16-60527
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER DESHANE BENOMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHNNY CROCKETT, Warden, Kemper-Neshoba County Regional Correctional Facility
Christopher Benoman v. Johnny Crockett, Warden
as 15-60699
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER DESHANE BENOMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHNNY CROCKETT, Warden, Kemper-Neshoba County Regional Correctional Facility
Jeffrey Jackson v. Johnny Crockett, Warden
as 15-60226
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFREY JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHNNY CROCKETT, Warden, Kemper-Neshoba County Regional Correctional Facility
Mardis v. Kemper Neshoba Regional Correctional Facility
as 3:2014cv00716
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ryan Mardis
Defendant:
Kemper Neshoba Regional Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rush v. Higgason et al
as 3:2014cv00515
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Tyrone Rush
Defendant:
Keith Alexander, Neil Higginson, Candre Hampton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Kemper County Court et al
as 3:2013cv00906
Plaintiff:
Ralph Sanders
Defendant:
Kemper County and James Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Kemper County Court et al
as 4:2011cv00189
Plaintiff:
Ralph Sanders
Defendant:
Kemper County Court and James Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nealy v. Moore et al
as 4:2011cv00187
Plaintiff:
Roy Nealy
Defendant:
James Moore, Kemper Neshoba Regional Correctional Facility and State Inmate Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosamond v. Kemper Neshoba Correctional Facility Staff et al
as 4:2011cv00023
Plaintiff:
Christopher Leon Rosamond
Defendant:
Kemper Neshoba Correctional Facility Staff, Lizzie Carptenter and Kieth Odom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
