Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Odom v. Carvajal et al
as 1:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
Gary DeWitt Odom
Defendant:
FNU Carvajal, J. Baltazar, FNU Garrido and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Holt v. Rogers et al
as 6:2017cv00109
Defendant:
Baker & Tisdale, PLLC, C/O Amy Brizendine, Amy Kay Brizenoine and others
Plaintiff:
Tutankhamun Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Killen et al
as 4:2017cv00889
Petitioner:
Cozy B. Washington
Respondent:
Lt. Killen, Sgt. Johnson Hill, Property Officer Saenz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeremy Mundine v. Charles Landis, et al
as 16-20511
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY MUNDINE
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES LANDIS, Warden, KEITH GORSUCH, Warden, AMY KILLEN, Sergeant and others
Broussard v. Killen
as 1:2016cv00137
Plaintiff:
Lee Broussard
Defendant:
Alfread Killen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sawyer v. Director TDCJ-CID, et al
as 7:2013cv00090
Plaintiff:
Thomas Sawyer
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID, David Potter, Richard E. Wathen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edgar Killen v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 12-60277
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDGAR RAY KILLEN
Respondent - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Prieto v. Quarterman, et al
as 09-40002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAFAEL ALVARO PRIETO
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, RAYMOND THOMPSON, J BELL and others
Killen v. Epps et al
as 4:2008cv00077
Plaintiff:
Edgar Ray Killen
Defendant:
Christopher Epps and Mississippi Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Killen v. Epps et al
as 1:2008cv00253
Plaintiff:
Edgar Ray Killen
Defendant:
Christopher Epps and Mississippi Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
