Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Aguirre v. Securus Technology et al
as 6:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Arnold Aguirre
Defendant:
Securus Technology, Ariel Burks, Unknown Pharr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Collier et al
as 5:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Gary Smith
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Warden Michael Feazell, Assistant Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Metcalf et al
as 4:2023cv03394
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Rodriguez and Jonathan Rodriguez
Defendant:
Tallen R. Metcalf, Tracy Hutts, Jonothan Chisum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00890
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Lamb et al
as 4:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
Gary Smith
Defendant:
Warden Lamb, Major Metcalf, Sargeant Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Metcalf v. Dr. Julye et al
as 9:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
M.C. Metcalf
Defendant:
Dr. Julye, Dr. Montgomery, Unknown Female Officer Rover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Gregory et al
as 1:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Preston L Dean
Defendant:
Jackie Gregory, Ginger Fabrizio, FNU Lenoez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finney v. Collier
as 23-40066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chester Finney
Defendant / Appellee:
Brian Collier, Individually and in his/her official capacity as Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Michael Metcalf
Garcia v. Kizzie et al
as 4:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Mark Andrew Garcia
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Schlonda Kizzie, Captain Curtis Jordan, Asst. Warden Daniel Munoz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Metcalf v. Campbell
as 5:2022cv01866
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gerald Metcalf, Jr
Defendant:
Paul Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
