Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Nettles v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00980
Petitioner:
Donovan Nettles and Donavan Nettles
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nettles v. Garrido
as 1:2022cv00575
Petitioner:
Carl G Nettles
Respondent:
F J Garrido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nettles v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Camp
as 1:2022cv00186
Petitioner:
Carl G Nettles
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nettles v. Ojiako et al
as 3:2021cv00349
Plaintiff:
Milton Wayne Nettles
Defendant:
Oleka U Ojiako, Prince O Okoronkwo, Tennissia M Fieldsa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Jones et al
as 6:2020cv00614
Defendant:
Warden Jacqueline Jones, FNU Barker, Sgt. FNU Nettles and others
Plaintiff:
Amelia Marie Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nettles v. Davis
as 5:2019cv00571
Petitioner:
Milton Wayne Nettles
Respondent:
Judge Catherine Torres-Stahl, District Clerk's Office Criminal Section and Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nettles v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2015cv02661
Petitioner:
Shane Matthew Nettles
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID, Jacqueline Dickerson and David Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Livingston et al
as 4:2013cv03406
Plaintiff:
Kevin Johnson
Respondent:
Brad Livingston, Regina Grimes, Stuart Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nettles v. United States Of America
as 1:2011cv00697
Petitioner:
Shannon Dean Nettles
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Nettles v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2010cv00736
Petitioner:
Leonard Nettles
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
