Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Harris v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00469
Petitioner:
Jim R. Harris, Jr.
Respondent:
Uknown Warden
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bell v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Joel Bell
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powell v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ray Powell
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Armando Cook
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maida v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Maida
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2022cv00444
Plaintiff:
Isom D Rogers, III
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Petitioner:
Antoine Jackson, DeMariol Byrd, Donte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Harris v. Arteaga et al
as 5:2021cv00612
Defendant:
Lorraine Ann Arteaga, FNU Brewer and Assistant District Attorney
Plaintiff:
Tommy R. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. Davis et al
as 1:2021cv00093
Defendant:
Kolawole S. Bamigboye, Kourtney L. Hadnot, Rockella J. Neal and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Gene Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. Davis et al
as 1:2020cv00447
Defendant:
Kolawole S. Bamigboye, Kourtney L. Hadnot, Rockella J. Neal and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Gene Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Boykin et al
as 1:2019cv00306
Defendant:
Christopher L Norsworthy, Aaron L Thompkins, Bruce H Fredrick and others
Plaintiff:
Latthen Chance Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
